NEW CHESS UPDATE

➡️ Get My Chess Courses:
➡️ Start Playing Chess FOR FREE:

➡️ Enjoy my videos? Donate Here :

Email me your games: [email protected]
Sponsors, Business, Media: [email protected] – [DO NOT SEND GAMES HERE]

⭐️ Follow Me If You Are Amazing:
➡️ TWITCH:
➡️ TIKTOK:
➡️ CAMEO:
➡️ TWITTER:
➡️ INSTAGRAM:
➡️ GOTHAM DISCORD:

➡️ THUMBNAILS BY:

%1$ Comments827

    I disagree Levy. Seems like that would mess up the game. Maybe in a different version.

    And then he sacrifices THE KING!!! because IF YOU TAKE THE KING YOU HAVE PAWN TO H69 CHECKMATE.

    I’d be down for a thing like you have to actually capture the king instead of just checkmate it, and if you are put into check or checkmate, you can still move, and you can move 1 more time after your king is taken, so if you have a good position, you can also capture their king, and it would be a draw

    I think it would make the game more fun. The moment you're in check if you don't notice you lose

    Thats the point of the check, it is a warning that if the king doesnt move or isnt protected, it will be taken, which goes against the idea of winning

    And he sacrificed… THE KIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIING!

    hikaru: looks up and is confused
    Me: takes the king and walks off

    As a kid i played a lot of chess but it ends when you take the king so no stalemates

    Lol I had requested for this vid on Twitch

    The next rule: Pawns can promote to another King

    If you are playing a bullet game,
    And you give a check and your opponent ignores that you can capture the

    TTTTTTTTTTHHHHHHHHEEEEEEE
    KKKKKIIIIIIIIINNNNNNNGGGG

    bro was fighting demons after he saw that

    Tbh this rule is so stupid when I played in all tournament my opponent made his king go into checks and when I tried to take they told me u can't then made him get more time (I won anyway) but why can't I take the king if my opponent is dump

    Capturing king is just next move after checkmate.

    Petition to make it so that if an opponent makes the king able to be captured it should be capturable

    Don't you end the game without taking it because it's just a waste of time to actually take it ?

    Wait…
    Isn't getting checkmate not getting the inevitable capture of your king on the next move…?

    What if putting yourself in check at any time was allowed, it's up to the opponent to find a checkmate?

    could the rules actually change so that king capture becomes a thing? i totally agree, it's way more simple than all the rules for checkmating and stalemating

    Yeah, but isn't if kings are capturable for u and can't escape it it's a checkmate?

    It wouldn't matter I'd you could capture the king, each game would just go on for 1 more move

    If capturing the king will be legal than stalemate would be impossible…

    But bullets would be more fun

    The only man in history capturing the king is frank. He did this with premoves 😂

    My brother would always take my king when I blundered it

    Pro pressed his panick button and sacrificed his KINNNNGGGG

    I just know we can't capture the king lol

    Fellas, is it gay for the kings to touch?

    I had a house rule that if the kings touch its a draw

    Yeah. Same opinion. Just imagine. No more frustration because someone stalemated with a queen. You forgot the pin and you lose…

    YES!! I also tought this would be a great rule: If the opponent doesnt See He can captured the King you didnt losse

    You should be able to capture the king. When your king is taken, you lose the game on the spot. In a checkmate scenario, the opponent plays one last move and then you take the king.

    If you could capture the king in chess, i would always blunder it and lose

    Bro took kings gambit To a whole different level💀💀

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *