NEW CHESS UPDATE

➡️ Get My Chess Courses:
➡️ Start Playing Chess FOR FREE:

➡️ Enjoy my videos? Donate Here :

Email me your games: [email protected]
Sponsors, Business, Media: [email protected] – [DO NOT SEND GAMES HERE]

⭐️ Follow Me If You Are Amazing:
➡️ TWITCH:
➡️ TIKTOK:
➡️ CAMEO:
➡️ TWITTER:
➡️ INSTAGRAM:
➡️ GOTHAM DISCORD:

➡️ THUMBNAILS BY:

%1$ Comments827

    Checkmate as a concept is threatening to capture the king while there is no move to prevent it, so why not make it so that you actually capture the king to win? And while we’re at it, make it non mandatory to respond to checks, if the opponent misses it it’s like seeing an army at your doorstep and sending your troops to some other country, let them capture the king.

    I agree I think you should be able to take the king

    CHESS is not GAY GAME no kings touch. GOOD.

    In my last tournament my oponent also touched my king 😀 i wanted to take his king so bad

    And in this position "He Sacrificed The GAAAAAAAAAMMEEEEEE."

    If it’s that much of a blunder I think yes you should be able to capture the king

    Damn sometimes I use to do illegal moves and my king used to get caputerd my brothers said it was rule

    I used to play chess like that where you capture the king to win before I knew about checkmate

    Yeah if you blunder your king you should just lose

    When I played chess when I was younger me and my friends would always take the king

    literally the only thing checks and checkmate add to the game is stalemate which is hated by most players who encounter it. if the objective of the game was to simply capture the game it's go the exact same except for 1 extra turn of capturing the king and stalemates not being a thing

    No because then you are checking the king but he is also checking your king. You can’t move your piece into check

    Levy in 2050: AND HE SACRIFICED…..THE KINGGGGGGGG

    there is an app called 2 player game and there is alot of games and chess too and there if you dont see a check then ooponent can take your king you cant play with anyone who is not next to you bc you have to play it on the same phone sadly

    Apparently kings can touch

    Kings after hearing that 😏

    Hey gotham no hate but everyone makes mistakes under time pressure.

    I disagree, because then double checks would be too op

    They should do it so if your kings in check you can move a piece to pin the piece checking you against the king

    Chess has updated.
    This will take approximately 14638 GB
    Do you want to update when there is wifi?

    In my advanced chess app i have as a kid, you can expose your king and move pinned pieces, and the opponent can take king or leave it if they didnt realize..

    Capturing the king should be a rule, it adds a new level of fun

    If I was hikaru in that position I would literally just take the king with my king and raise my hand for a handshake

    I think you should be able to take the king if even if it isn't checkmate.

    I always found it odd that if you’re clueless and make an illegal move, your opponent is obligated to point it out and let you fix it. If you leave any other piece hanging, your opponent is allowed to pounce on that, but not the king?
    Also stalemates being a draw is BS. In other games similar to chess, stalemate-like positions count as wins, and stalemates generally only happen when one opponent is playing significantly better than the other. Is it really fair to call the game a draw because the better player made one bad move when their opponent made like 5 bad moves?
    And before anyone is like “oh you must be a beginner to think that way”, I’ve been playing chess for 15 years and these are things that still bug me

    He sacrificed THE KIIIIIIIIIIINNNNNNNNNNG!

    "Confuse yourself before you confuse the enemy" 😂😂😂

    I personally think that If you don't have any pieces you lose

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *