NEW CHESS UPDATE
06.04.2023
➡️ Get My Chess Courses:
➡️ Start Playing Chess FOR FREE:
➡️ Enjoy my videos? Donate Here :
Email me your games: [email protected]
Sponsors, Business, Media: [email protected] – [DO NOT SEND GAMES HERE]
⭐️ Follow Me If You Are Amazing:
➡️ TWITCH:
➡️ TIKTOK:
➡️ CAMEO:
➡️ TWITTER:
➡️ INSTAGRAM:
➡️ GOTHAM DISCORD:
➡️ THUMBNAILS BY:
if they add that rule in the game, it will be 100x harder.. please let me to at least be a GM before you add such a rule
Chess Players After Finnaly Getting Chess 2.1 Update :
bro I thought this was gonna be an actual update
And he secrefises the RULESSS
He was playing pre moves..
You should be able to touch kings, as long as your own king is protected, hence a trade of kings, with an outcome of a draw. So if your king is protected by another piece, you should be able to either draw the game or keep going. (if you touch kings but yours is protected it would be seen as a draw offer.)
Just think about it, if you HAVE TO capture the king, imagen the toxicity that can ocurre when the loser just waits 10 mins to play the last move😅
It should be like Chinese chess, being able to capture your opponents king
the real king's gambit
That should be a game mode called silent check
YEAHHHH BABY NO MORE STALEMATE IT'S NOW JUST A CRAZY ZUGZWANG WOOO
Thatd be so good. No frickin stalemates!
THERE IS A BOT AND IT LOOKS LIKE YOU, ITS NAME IS LARIO
i have a idea, if theres 2 king it will not be a draw until they touch so you can just move the king around until theres no time left for the loser and the winner win because they have more time
If you move your king so that the kings touch you create a CHECK for your king which makes it an illegal move. Unless we make a rule that a king can not give a check! Then your king could capture it if that king is hanging. It would make the endgame more interesting.
Nah man I remember chatgpt vs stokfish where stokfish took the king😅😅😅😅
Is he seriously trying to revive the legends old game?? 😅😂
Bro it's the genius tactic king sacrifice
Yes
And he sacrificed…..
Read More…
I remember in 3rd grade i captured my opponents king. I checked he didn't noticed and I didn't told him either and since we were not aware of the rules( just knew how pieces moved) he accepted jis defeat.
100% you should be able to capture the king
Nobody new levy
He sacrificed the kinggggg
Yes
Hikamura Nakaru
Bro played Kings Gambit: French Variation
If you start with "you lose if your king is captured" and add in "if you're able to take your opponent's king, you must", its easy to develop that to "if you end your turn in check you've automatically lost" and then all the existing rules around check and mate.
I do agree
um actually its arbiter not refferee xdxddxddxd
Bro played the king's gambit declined
I like how Hikaru is just stunned and confused😂
Nope😅
"I want to see some OILED UP KING WRESTLING, let's go" – Levy
Vidhit gujarati is from my state
Hfryjhghjkknm
The kings were kissing like homies do, making allies
Yes
Dude your comment are 0 but inside are full wtf😑
Kings gambit:chatgpt variation
nah i dont think capturing the king would be good
Day 6 of asking levy to make a guide to sacrificing pieces titled sacrificing the BOOOOOOOOOOOK
yes
YES
That's how I play tho?😂
yes
I think you should be able to capture kings. Checks can still exist but if you can take a king then whoever takes it first wins
There's this game called blox fruits. In that game there's a chess board where you can capture the king. The game doesn't tell you if you're in check, you need good eyesight to make sure your king didn't get eaten
100% agree
That should've ate the king without waiting
Bruh no