Is Hikaru Cheating?? Kramnik “YES!!!”

On November 24 Kramnik tripled down on his accusations.

๐Ÿ‘LIVE MOST WEEKDAYS ON KICK โ–บ

โ™Ÿ๏ธ LEARN CHESS & PLAY WITH ME โ–บ
๐ŸŽ GIVE ๐Ÿ’Ž CHESS โ–บ
๐ŸŽฌ CLIPS CHANNEL โ–บ
๐ŸŽž๏ธ MORE GMHIKARU โ–บ
๐Ÿ’œ TWITCH โ–บ
๐Ÿ“ธ INSTAGRAM โ–บ
๐Ÿฆ TWITTER โ–บ
โœจ TIKTOK โ–บ
๐Ÿ’› DISCORD โ–บ
๐Ÿ’™ FACEBOOK โ–บ
๐Ÿ’š SUPPORT โ–บ
๐Ÿคฃ REDDIT โ–บ
โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”
๐ŸŽจ Thumbnail โ–บ JojoChessNoob
๐ŸŽฅ Edit โ–บ Chaedoc
๐Ÿ‘ŒChannel Management โ–บ Team Hikaru
๐Ÿ“ง Global Business contact: [email protected]
๐Ÿ“ญChinese Brand Business contact: [email protected]

#gmhikaru #chess #cheatinginchess

367 Comments

  1. It's sad he cannot stomach people being better than him and thinking he is smarter than he truly is…

  2. Kramnik : accuses Hikaru of cheating.
    Hikaru: " !! CONTENT !! ๐Ÿ“ˆ๐Ÿ“ˆ

  3. Kramnik took the 'stockfish at the ceiling' way too serious that it's already in on his head

  4. Paranoia is common in adderall abuse ๐Ÿซข

  5. Kramnik, if you see this, you suck ๐Ÿ˜‚

  6. I don't know if he really knows his math, here. You can't really apply normal probability calculations here. It's not like you flip a coin here 46 times. Streaks are very normal in games, however if Hikaru would shown the best hand in poker 45 times in a row I would be somewhat suspicious. But this is more similar to Mayweather winning 50 matches in a row, simply because he was so much better than his opposition.

  7. As a math person I would like to suggest having a Math face off between Hikaru and Kramnik. Winner takes all ๐Ÿคฃ

  8. kramnik should admit he is wrong and apologize otherwise he's just the next fischer post champion

  9. I'm PhD in CS (doing math for the most part), and I can tell you that only a basic knowledge of statistics is required to see flaws in Kramnik's reasoning. Maybe you are a cheater, but his argument does not prove it at all.

  10. FIDE should sanction him for being an israel

  11. I love how Hikaru is milking this for views/money ๐Ÿ˜‚

    Whilest clearly not being a cheater.. .

  12. Wasn't that what hikaru Magnus and the rest did to Hans?I mean get serious

  13. Very disappointing to hear Kramnik's baseless accusations.

  14. Can we talk about how stupid it is for someone to say "the stats my opponents put are laughable" without debunking them? The example Hikaru gave previous video (about a series of many coin tosses being heads being LIKELY over a sufficient amount of tries) is literally what I thought (I am a computer engineer with some stat bg btw)

  15. say what you will about big Vlad but he's a much better chess player than you will ever be.

  16. I'm a physicist and I remember grading the first lab course for first years. All the experiments are designed to teach the students some basic statistics. Coming out of highschool, students have to learn a new way of thinking (why would you teach kids statistics, right?) and it often leads to some hilarious things. In my office we had this wall of shame for the dumbest shit they came up with, mostly because doing the grunt work for professors is mind-numbing and you have to entertain yourself somehow. Kramnik would be on that wall, no doubt.

    I expected a chess player of his caliber to be a little bit smarter. Because even though statistics can be counterintuitive, especially when talking about large numbers (our brain isn't wired to deal with that. Politicians use that fact a lot), the experts explaining the situation in Hikaru's favor (and in simple, highschool level terms) should have made sense for someone like him. At this point, he's either mentally ill or stirring the pot for attention.

  17. If I had a dollar for every time he said 'at the end of the day,' I could retire by, well, the end of the day ๐Ÿ˜€

  18. Kramnik has so far delivered zero evidence and zero names of his so called professional mathematicians.

  19. Cringemnik is the "uneducated uncle on Facebook" of chess now.

  20. I have a Masters of Statistics from Texas A&M. Just like a mate-in-three is obvious to you, this case is obvious to me. It would be more unlikely that there wouldn't be these outlying streaks in thousands of games against weaker opponents. The math has been shown by many very competent people already, but just wanted to reiterate how clear it is from the perspective of someone who knows how probability works.

    I've lost so much respect for Kramnik as I hear him dismiss logic just so he can pretend to be a Savior figure for the sport. He would be embarrassed if his ego would allow it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.