Magnus Carlsen: 3850 Elo

➡️ Get My Chess Courses:
➡️ Start Playing Chess FOR FREE:

➡️ Enjoy my videos? Donate Here :

Email me your games: [email protected]
Sponsors, Business, Media: [email protected] – [DO NOT SEND GAMES HERE]

⭐️ Follow Me If You Are Amazing:
➡️ TWITCH:
➡️ TIKTOK:
➡️ CAMEO:
➡️ TWITTER:
➡️ INSTAGRAM:
➡️ GOTHAM DISCORD:

➡️ THUMBNAILS BY:

%1$ Comments496

    Magnus had again set a bar too high for other people

    0:30 its not potential anymore. Magnus did everything can be done in chess and more than once

    He is the goat

    This match just proves that players are still not just completely playing like computers. Creativity is still alive

    Magnus is the LeBron James of chess. “Potentially” the best player ever

    Here after Scottie's newest video saying "MJ was a horrible player" or smth like that

    Magnus being better than computers is +1 for humanity.

    It's crazy that he's better than the best machines lol

    your click-baity promises Carlen and delivers teasy little you. oh hum.

    Me 1800 happy to get 2350 by computer. Magnus Carlsen…

    Levi stockfish is rated 4000, check TCEC index.

    Im curious where you got the name gothamchess from.

    I love Magnus but HE HAS TO CUT THE HAIR

    Respect to the Chinese guy for rockin' the panda avatar. That animal is their national treasure.

    He's a genius. I'm talking about Carlsen here. I mean, Gotham's alright 'n'all, but Carlsen really is a genius.

    This is Magnus after playing chess 2.0 for a while

    Now we can all see why he doesn't need that world champion title. He's going to full fight the engines!

    I prefer the no stockfish viewing of chess

    For me, it's sticking the Bishops up my bumhole.

    if i made the exact same moves as magnus i would've been mated

    Sources came to know that even SKYNET felt endangered during this game!!!

    always nicely done and a pleasure to watch
    Honest chess analysis with a lightness of touch
    Levy makes it fun

    Question: since magnus scored a higher elo than stockfish, shouldn't this game be 100% accuracy according to stockfish ? i thought that the accuracy rating was given by stockfish ?

    Don't tell Magnus that he's good in chess 😅😅😅

    Magnus just screwed the shit out of stock fish

    It was 3850 v/s 2850. 1000 elo diffrents not fair…

    I always do prefer watching high level games with the eval bar off.

    It's a cool game but imho a bit overhyped. Even I (~1700) saw that d6 idea instantly. Magnus' decision making and precision in calculations is of course insane but the ideas are pretty straightforward.

    Hi gothamchess.
    Can you pls start your 10 minutes chess opening series once again like the previous videos cause it is absolutely amazing and very helpful for me and I'm sure it'll be helpful for others as well

    Hi GothamChess, love your videos. I wanted to share a thought: while chess undoubtedly requires strategy and critical thinking, it's interesting how being good at chess doesn't necessarily translate to a measure of overall intellect. The capacity to learn and excel in various other domains is just as significant, reflecting diverse aspects of intelligence. That being said, the mental agility demonstrated in your games is truly remarkable. Keep up the great content!

    Hi GothamChess, love your videos. I wanted to share a thought: while chess undoubtedly requires strategy and critical thinking, it's interesting how being good at chess doesn't necessarily translate to a measure of overall intellect. The capacity to learn and excel in various other domains is just as significant, reflecting diverse aspects of intelligence. That being said, the mental agility demonstrated in your games is truly remarkable. Keep up the great content!

    getting a elo of 3850 and still not having a briljant move in the game🧐

    getting a elo of 3850 and still not having a briljant move in the game🧐

    Well mine was my friend beat me 30 times then I finally won

    Well mine was my friend beat me 30 times then I finally won

    I think the reason is that Stockfish predicts best moves from both sides. In order for Carlson attack to work there should be a human mistake. If he was playing against the computer his attack woudnt be successful and thats why stockfish didnt see it as good until the mistake was made by his opponent.

    A Panda would beat me at chess 8 out of 10 times. That's how bad I am at it… I'm dead serious xD

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *