The Worst Chess Game Mathematically Possible

➡️ Get My Chess Courses:
➡️ Start Playing Chess FOR FREE:

➡️ Enjoy my videos? Donate Here :

Email me your games: [email protected]
Sponsors, Business, Media: [email protected] – [DO NOT SEND GAMES HERE]

⭐️ Follow Me If You Are Amazing:
➡️ TWITCH:
➡️ TIKTOK:
➡️ CAMEO:
➡️ TWITTER:
➡️ INSTAGRAM:
➡️ GOTHAM DISCORD:

➡️ THUMBNAILS BY:

%1$ Comments634

    9:05 Everybody saw this line.

    Levy is the kind of person who thinks everyone is a GM

    Why is moving the king in the center the worst move? It makes opponent lose opening theory,and it preventes back rank mate?

    This video perfectly explains how our politicians make policy decisions.

    Me just listening to the vid while doing work "if you didn't see that you weren't paying attention"…. True

    10:58 i can find 3 ways to blunder mate in 1 and only 1 is tipping over my own king.

    This is like something out of Asimov's Laws of Robotics if each Stockfish thought they were playing against a human and Law 4 was you can't damage a human's ego or through inaction allow their ego to be damaged

    I thought the worst means both sides hang M1 alternatively.

    The scoreboard on the left playing ping pong on that game

    I want to see the eval graph afterward and the computer's elo estimation

    For anyone curious, 1st capture was at 6:51. I know that was the thing I was most curious about when the idea of the video was pitched.

    You should do a video where both sides just play random moves

    Damn, didnt know I was stock fish just backwards

    Levy has the worst broccoli cut mathematicaly possible

    0:230:36 I never thought that I'd see How to Lose at Chess: Stockfish Edition of all things.

    now do this, but it's ChatGPT making the moves; blundering while teleporting/summoning bishops and queens is going to be funny.

    it can get worse, because computer picked a move that would be the worst possible for him if he playes the best moves later, but if he would calculate knowing that he's gonna play the worst move again and again, then he would find something even worse

    The eval bar : 🎶moving up and down, side to side, like a roller-coaster🎶

    "Drunk stockfish really likes ponies…not like that"

    ENUMCLAW REPRESENT

    “hey I made it into a gothamchess video”

    the video:

    I’m surprised the engine couldn’t find any moves to force the opponent to take their piece

    I feel like knowing the worst move each turn is just as valuable as knowing what exactly to do each turn.

    Bro I’m interested in the mate in 40 stockfish calculated at 15:23

    Every position in this game looks visually better than all of my positions

    now you need to make stockfish also know that the other stockfish will make the worst possible move so that the entire tree search would hone in on situations where there's a forced mate on your opponent

    2:54 "White plays Qe1 with the intention to lose the queen on h4"

    This comment actually doesn't make sense. To my understanding, the bots only look at one move at a time — for any position, evaluate all the legal moves, then pick the one with the worst evaluation. They are not looking ahead. The evaluation of the move Qe1, by itself, should not be terrible because the evaluation would not expect the next move to lose the queen. I believe it just happens that Qe1 is just a slightly worse move than many other moves, probably for positional reasons.

    Not a criticism by any means — this game is certainly unusual, and I appreciate Levy for covering it. It is just interesting to see that it is hard to completely detach ourselves from the usual way of thinking.

    It would be cool to program stockfish to smartly try to lose. Like instead of just playing the worst move possible every move, try to force the opponent to win.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *